Science Meets ReligionMusings about modern science and religion | |
|
Introduction It is widely believed that modern society is in sharp decline. Among the ills cited are skyrocketing rates of crime, divorce, teenage sex, teenage births and drug abuse and a general decline in personal morality and religiosity. Religious fundamentalists frequently pin the blame on modern science in general, and on evolution in particular. For . . . → Read More: Is science or religion to blame for moral decline? One of the most common arguments against evolution raised by creationist and intelligent design writers is that whereas minor changes may occur within an established “kind,” nothing fundamentally new can come through “random” or “undirected” evolution. In any event, so they argue, no significant changes have ever been observed in biological species, so that evolution . . . → Read More: How fast can evolution operate? For decades physicists have dreamed of a theory of everything that would precisely give all known physical particles and their interactions. Physicists have also hoped that this theory would be so simple and compelling as to be the self-evident “natural” way the universe must be constructed. Physicists have definitely made progress on the first objective. . . . → Read More: Is the universe one or many? Introduction Recently several books written by prominent authors have been published that attack religious belief as a pernicious delusion. The four most prominent authors are Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, who collectively are often called the “new atheists” [Dawkins2006; Dennett2006; Harris2006; Hitchens2007]. In his book, prominent biologist Richard Dawkins asks us . . . → Read More: Are there benefits to religious belief and participation? DNA evidence in forensics On March 18, 2013, a Florida man was found guilty of burglary and criminal damage to property, in an attempt to steal an ATM machine from a store. But the burglar had dropped his hat, and subsequent analysis of DNA in the hat matched that of a suspect. Based on this . . . → Read More: Criminology, sports drug testing and evolution The saga of Hiroo Onoda March 2013 is the 39th anniversary of a curious milestone of 20th century military history: On March 9, 1974, nearly 29 years after World War II supposedly ended with the Japanese surrender, Hiroo Onoda, the last Japanese holdout, turned over his sword and rifle to his commanding officer and ceased . . . → Read More: The last Japanese WWII holdout: A lesson for creationists Introduction Many religious fundamentalists reject the notion (adopted by many scientists as well as theologians) that God accomplished the creation of the earth or even the entire universe indirectly through natural processes. More to the point, these fundamentalists deny that God accomplished the creation of life on earth via an evolutionary process. Typical of those . . . → Read More: Did God create the world through evolution? Recently (on 12 Feb 2013), well-known MIT physicist Max Tegmark, together with co-authors Eugene Lee and Meia Chita-Tegmark, released results of a new study on science, religion and origins. See also Max Tegmark’s Huffington Post article summarizing these findings. It is well-known that, according to a recent Gallup poll, approximately 46% of Americans believe that . . . → Read More: Who are more stubborn? Fundamentalists or atheists? Introduction Both creationist and intelligent design writers assert that science has yet to understand the origin of life, and further claim that this is a fatal flaw in evolutionary theory [Behe1996; Dembski1998]. It is true that as of the present time, scientists do not yet fully understand biogenesis (as the origin of life is often . . . → Read More: Have scientists found any evidence for the origin of life? Introduction A 2009 poll found that 39% of Americans agreed that “God created the universe, the earth, the sun, moon, stars, plants, animals and the first two people within the past 10,000 years” [Bishop2010]. Needless to say, such notions are completely in conflict with modern scientific research. Radiometric dating schemes used in geology and paleontology . . . → Read More: How accurate are radioactivity-based geological dates? |
Comments are closed 