Both creationist and intelligent design writers assert that there are large gaps in the fossil record. Creationist Henry Morris, for instance, asserts that there are “systematic gaps” in the fossil record, and “There is no evidence that there have ever been transitional forms between these basic kinds.” [Morris2000, pg. 78-79].
In discussing this issue,
Continue reading Are there “missing links” in the fossil record?
Even among those who believe the Bible to be the word of God, most are willing to accept that the Bible has some imperfections, such as translation errors, copyist errors, omissions and questionable inclusions, and, in any event, the Bible was never intended to be read primarily as a scientific or historical treatise —
Continue reading Can biblical chronology be used to date creation?
Popular wisdom holds that old-earth geology and evolution remain somewhat controversial in the scientific community, and, in particular, that many scientists question evolution. But on this count popular wisdom is quite mistaken — only a fraction of 1% of qualified scientists believe there are reasonable grounds to question the basic tenets of these theories. See
Continue reading Do religious colleges teach old-earth geology and evolution?
One of the issues most frequently raised by both creationist and and intelligent design writers is the question of gaps in the fossil record, and, in particular, of “missing links” between “apes” and humans. In one sense, such a question is improperly posed — science does not propose that a modern “ape” (gorilla, bonobo
Continue reading Prehuman fossils: an embarrassment of riches
September 29, 2014 is the 467th birthday of Spanish author Miguel de Cervantes, whose immortal Don Quixote is widely regarded as one of the greatest works of literature in any language. In fact, in 2002 the Norwegian Book Club named Don Quixote as “best literary work ever written” in their listing of the
Continue reading Creationists: modern-day Don Quixotes?
The “intelligent design” movement was formed in the mid-1990s by a group of scholars whose objective was to present a significantly more tenable alternative to evolution than that promoted by young-earth creationists such as Henry Morris and John Whitcomb. The principal figures of the intelligent design movement, notably Michael Behe, William Dembski, Phillip Johnson
Continue reading Is intelligent design a legitimate scientific movement?
Several of the “New Atheist” school of writers dismiss the Bible as without scientific foundation. In part, these writers reflect the thinking of the “minimalist” or “Copenhagen” approach to biblical scholarship that was popular during the 1990s and the 2000s. This school of thought has argued, for example, that essentially all of the Old
Continue reading Is the Bible supported by modern archaeology?
Amir Aczel, a mathematician at the University of Massachusetts, Boston and author of numerous papers on mathematics and science, has just published a new book, Why Science Does Not Disprove God.
Aczel was prompted to write this book in the wake of several recent works by authors such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens,
Continue reading Review of Amir Aczel’s “Why Science Does Not Disprove God”
In the recent Cosmos series, as well as in some widely available science videos distributed by the Learning Company (and available on Netflix), noted physicist/cosmologist Neil deGrasse Tyson reviews, in a very entertaining yet informative way, the history of science through the ages, leading up to our latest attempts to understand physical laws and
Continue reading Has religion always been at war with science?
In a dramatic announcement on March 16, 2014, a team of astronomers led by John Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics said that they have detected gravitational waves, confirming predictions made by mathematical physicists Alan Guth, Andrei Linde and others in the 1970s and 1980s.
Gravitational waves from inflation, with their distinctive twisting pattern,
Continue reading Is philosophy needed in mathematics and science?